Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
It is well known that there are plenty of museums, which apply admission fees, meanwhile, others are more likely to provide free entrance for people. In my view, the advantages of applied additional charges for visitors outweigh the drawbacks for several reasons.
Nowadays there are a plethora of galleries which are completely free, but some of them still have charges. With this in mind, they apply a fee for entrance to the building, since that money can be used for various purposes. For example, even though an abundance of governments supports the museum’s staff salary, they still are too low. For this reason, when galleries get additional financial support they can increase their employee’s payments. Moreover, with further money, they can develop museums inside and outside the design and even purchase new exhibitions, which can attract more people’s attention.
However, admission charges might also have a negative impact on museums due to places which are completely free. To be clear, visitors might choose not to visit those places, which are charged, since they know that they are able to find galleries without any fees. As a result, charged places might lose their popularity between art fans and have a decrease in their extra incomes, which will slow their development.
In conclusion, even though some people might refuse to visit museums, which have charges, there still will be an enormous number of people who will visit charged places in order to support these places, since they are able to understand the advantages of those applied fees.