The birth rate in most developed countries is predicted to fall over the next 50 years. By 2030 it is estimated that over one-third of the population in most developed countries will be aged 65 and over. What effects will the predictions have in developed countries if they prove true? What can be done now to deal with this situation? What is your view? Give reasons for your answer.
Sample Answer:
In recent years, there has been a global movement towards prohibiting smoking in public places, with many countries implementing strict regulations to limit smoking in public areas. Additionally, many office authorities have also imposed restrictions on smoking within the office premises. While some individuals support these measures and advocate for a complete ban on smoking, others argue that it encroaches on personal freedom. In my opinion, I believe that the restrictions on smoking in public places and office premises are necessary for the greater good of society.
First and foremost, it is important to recognize the detrimental health effects of secondhand smoke. Non-smokers who are exposed to secondhand smoke are at an increased risk of developing various health conditions, including respiratory infections, heart disease, and lung cancer. By implementing restrictions on smoking in public places and office environments, we are not only protecting non-smokers from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke but also promoting a healthier and safer environment for everyone.
Furthermore, smoking in public places can also contribute to environmental pollution. Cigarette butts and packaging are often discarded improperly, leading to littering in public areas. This not only detracts from the aesthetics of the environment but also poses a threat to wildlife and marine life when these non-biodegradable materials end up in water bodies. By prohibiting smoking in public places, we can work towards creating cleaner and more sustainable environments for current and future generations.
While some may argue that these restrictions infringe upon personal freedom, it is important to consider the greater good of society. The right to smoke should not supersede the right of non-smokers to breathe clean air and live in a litter-free environment. Moreover, individuals still have the freedom to smoke in designated areas or private spaces where their actions do not adversely affect others.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the restrictions on smoking in public places and office premises are essential for promoting public health and environmental sustainability. While it may be perceived as a limitation on personal freedom, the benefits of these measures far outweigh any perceived drawbacks. It is imperative that we continue to advocate for and enforce these restrictions to create healthier and cleaner environments for all members of society.
More Writing Task 2 Sample Essay
