Some high schools require all students to wear school uniforms. Other high schools permit students to decide what to wear to school. Which of these two school policies do you think is better? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
In criminal cases in the UK and Australia, the jury is not provided with information about the defendant’s past criminal record. This is done to ensure that the jury’s decision is based solely on the evidence presented in the current case, without being influenced by any preconceived notions about the defendant’s character. This practice is intended to protect the rights of the accused and to ensure a fair trial.
On the other hand, some lawyers argue that the jury should have access to the defendant’s past criminal record in order to make a more informed decision. They believe that knowing about the defendant’s previous offenses could help the jury to better understand the defendant’s character and make a more accurate judgment about their guilt or innocence.
In my opinion, I believe that the current practice of not disclosing the defendant’s past criminal record to the jury is the right approach. All individuals, regardless of their past actions, deserve to be treated as innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Providing the jury with information about the defendant’s past could lead to bias and prejudice, potentially influencing the jury’s decision in an unfair manner.
Furthermore, allowing the jury access to the defendant’s past criminal record could also lead to the risk of mistrial. The jury may be more inclined to believe that the defendant is guilty based on their past actions, rather than focusing on the evidence presented in the current case. This could ultimately lead to wrongful convictions and miscarriages of justice.
In conclusion, I believe that the current practice of not disclosing the defendant’s past criminal record to the jury is essential in upholding the principles of fairness and justice in the legal system. It is important to ensure that all individuals are given a fair trial based on the evidence presented in the current case, without being prejudiced by their past actions.