In recent years some countries have experienced very rapid economic development. This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the country sides. This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole. What are these problems? How might they be reduced?
Sample Answer:
In recent years, the debate over whether old buildings should be protected by law or replaced by new ones has become a topic of great controversy. While some argue that preserving historical buildings is essential for maintaining a city’s cultural heritage, others believe that modernization is necessary for urban development. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and provide my own opinion on the matter.
Those who advocate for the protection of old buildings argue that they hold significant historical and cultural value. These buildings often serve as a reminder of a city’s rich history and can attract tourists, contributing to the local economy. Furthermore, preserving old buildings can help maintain a sense of identity and continuity in a rapidly changing world. For example, iconic landmarks such as the Eiffel Tower in Paris and the Colosseum in Rome are not only symbols of their respective cities but also important historical sites that draw millions of visitors each year.
On the other hand, proponents of replacing old buildings with new ones argue that modernization is essential for urban development. They believe that old buildings may not be structurally sound or equipped to meet the needs of a growing population. Additionally, demolishing old buildings and constructing new ones can lead to economic growth and job creation. For instance, the redevelopment of old industrial sites into modern residential and commercial spaces has revitalized many urban areas and contributed to their economic prosperity.
In my opinion, while it is important to embrace progress and modernization, it is equally crucial to preserve the historical and cultural heritage embodied in old buildings. Instead of viewing preservation and modernization as mutually exclusive, city planners should strive to strike a balance between the two. This can be achieved through adaptive reuse, where old buildings are repurposed for contemporary use while retaining their historical charm. By doing so, cities can benefit from both the economic advantages of modernization and the cultural significance of preserving their architectural heritage.
In conclusion, the debate over whether old buildings should be protected or replaced by new ones is complex and multifaceted. While both perspectives have their merits, I believe that a balanced approach that values both preservation and modernization is the most sustainable and beneficial for urban development.
More Writing Task 2 Sample Essay
