As computers are being used more and more in education, there will soon be no role for the teacher in the classroom.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Answer:
In the contemporary world, it is irrefutable that computers play an imperative strongly role in the education world. It is highly often argued among individuals whether teachers could be replaced by this modern device in the nearby future or their place is irreplaceable. I am in discord with the notion that teachers will be completely removed from the education system.
To commence, computers have no emotions to understand the plentiful needs of a student, and their knowledge is extremely limited to a particular course whereas tutors can teach in a way owning to different understanding capabilities of a distinct pupil. Despite the fact that computers can work more effectively than the teacher, it could not solve the doubt of a student which would be raised in their mind, and their course structure is limited to the program installed in it. To exemplify, in the U.S, even though they have advance computers in a classroom, they believe an instructor is mandatory to make them understand the concept. Therefore, even in the future over-dependent on the machine is not feasible.
Another coherent factor which propels that to maintain a computer need more money and have access to amenities such as electricity and the internet in contrast teacher can work on a fixed salary. In many developed countries, they are not only facing poverty issues but also electricity because of a lack of funds, and in such regions, computers are not an option. As a result, teachers are a convenient alternative in comparison to a computer.
In conclusion, I believe that computers cannot totally take a place of coach in a study room but could be work efficiently with a teacher aside in upcoming times.