The gap between rich and poor is becoming wider


The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming wider; the rich are becoming richer, and the poor are getting even poorer. What problems can the situation cause? What can be done to reduce this gap?


Sample Answer:

In recent years, there has been a growing trend towards prohibiting smoking in both private and public spaces. This has been driven by a desire to protect non-smokers from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke, as well as to promote a healthier environment for everyone. While some may argue that such measures infringe on individual freedoms, I believe that the banning of smoking in all public places is the right course of action.

First and foremost, it is important to consider the health implications of smoking, not only for the smoker themselves but also for those around them. Secondhand smoke has been proven to be just as harmful as smoking itself, and by allowing smoking in public places, we are putting non-smokers at risk of developing serious health issues. By implementing a ban on smoking in all public places, we are taking a proactive approach to safeguarding the health and well-being of the general population.

Furthermore, the banning of smoking in public places can also have a positive impact on the environment. Cigarette butts are one of the most commonly littered items, and they pose a significant threat to wildlife and the ecosystem. By prohibiting smoking in public places, we can reduce the amount of cigarette litter and help to create a cleaner and more sustainable environment for future generations.

It is also important to recognize that smoking is a highly addictive habit, and many people struggle to quit even when they are aware of the health risks. By implementing a ban on smoking in public places, we are creating a supportive environment that can help individuals to reduce their exposure to smoking triggers and potentially kick the habit for good.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that the banning of smoking in all public places is the right course of action. Not only does it protect non-smokers from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke, but it also promotes a cleaner and healthier environment for everyone. While some may argue that such measures infringe on individual freedoms, the overall benefits to public health and the environment far outweigh any potential drawbacks.


More Writing Task 2 Sample Essay


Leave a Comment