“Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?”
Sample Answer:
There is no denying that global environmental problems are a pressing issue that requires immediate attention. While some individuals believe that increasing the cost of fuel is the best solution to tackle these issues, I personally disagree with this approach.
Firstly, raising the cost of fuel may not necessarily lead to a significant reduction in environmental problems. People rely on fuel for various aspects of their daily lives, such as transportation and heating. Therefore, an increase in fuel prices may only result in a financial burden for individuals and businesses, without effectively addressing the root causes of environmental issues.
Furthermore, it is important to consider the potential negative impact on low-income individuals and developing countries. These groups are often the most vulnerable to the effects of environmental problems, and a hike in fuel prices could further exacerbate their hardships. It is crucial to find solutions that are equitable and considerate of the diverse socioeconomic circumstances across the globe.
Instead of solely focusing on increasing the cost of fuel, a more comprehensive approach should be adopted. This could include investing in renewable energy sources, implementing stricter regulations on emissions, and promoting sustainable practices in industries. By diversifying the strategies to address environmental problems, a more holistic and effective solution can be achieved.
In conclusion, while the intention behind raising the cost of fuel may be to combat global environmental problems, I believe that this approach is not the most viable or equitable solution. It is imperative to consider the broader implications and explore alternative measures that can bring about meaningful and sustainable change.
More Writing Task 2 Sample Essay